A dark blue gradient background featuring faint diagonal streaks and soft, semi-transparent geometric shapes, including rectangles and angled lines, creating a modern and minimal design.A dark blue gradient background featuring faint diagonal streaks and soft, semi-transparent geometric shapes, including rectangles and angled lines, creating a modern and minimal design.

What Are Some Common Misconceptions About Slip and Fall Injuries?

Posted on Jan 8, 2026 by The Advocates

Slip and fall accidents happen every day. In grocery stores, parking lots, apartment complexes, and even friends’ homes. Yet, few people understand how liability really works in these cases. 

Many assume that if you fell, you’re automatically at fault. Others believe that any fall on someone’s property makes the owner responsible. Neither is true. Washington’s laws on premises liability are built around reasonableness, what a careful person or property owner should have done to prevent harm.

Let’s clear up some of the most common misconceptions.

Myth 1: “If I fell, it’s automatically my fault.”

People often blame themselves after falling. “I wasn’t watching where I was going” or “I should’ve been more careful.” But in Washington, fault isn’t based on embarrassment or hindsight; it’s based on negligence.

Example:
You’re walking through a grocery store when you slip on a puddle of spilled milk that had been sitting there for several minutes without a caution sign or cleanup. Even if you were distracted for a moment, the store may still be liable because employees failed to address a clear safety hazard.

In other words, being momentarily distracted doesn’t erase a store’s duty to keep the premises safe.

Myth 2: “If I was running, it’s always my fault.”

Not necessarily. While running in a “no running” area (like a pool deck or mall corridor) can affect your share of fault, it doesn’t mean you lose your right to compensation altogether.

Washington follows a comparative negligence rule, which means your recovery can be reduced by your percentage of fault, but not eliminated unless you were entirely responsible.

Scenario 1 – Mall Accident:
You’re jogging lightly through a shopping mall to catch a friend, and your foot hits a patch of water leaking from a ceiling pipe that maintenance ignored for days. Even though running wasn’t ideal, the mall management can still share fault for not fixing a known hazard.

Scenario 2 – Public Pool Slip:
If you slip near a pool where “No Running” signs are posted, but there’s also a broken tile or slippery algae buildup that wasn’t maintained, the facility can still be partly liable. Safety signage doesn’t excuse negligence in maintenance.

Myth 3: “The property owner is only responsible if they knew about the danger.”

Property owners in Washington have a duty to inspect their premises regularly. That means they can be liable if they should have known about a hazard, even if they didn’t personally see it.

Imagine a grocery store where a customer accidentally drops a jar of olive oil in an aisle. The spill sits there for nearly 20 minutes before another shopper slips and gets hurt. The store owner might claim, “No one told us about the spill.” However, under Washington law, property owners are expected to inspect their property often enough to catch hazards like this in a reasonable time.

In this case, even though the owner didn’t actually know about the spill, a court could find they “should have known” — because a reasonable business would have routine floor checks or an employee monitoring that area.

Myth 4: “If I fall at a friend’s or neighbor’s house, the lawsuit is against them.”

Most people don’t want to “sue” someone they know, and in many cases, they don’t have to.

Claims like these typically go through homeowners’ insurance, not the person directly. This means you can receive help for medical bills and recovery costs without personally targeting your friend or neighbor.

Still, context matters. If you tripped over a loose step that your neighbor had been meaning to fix for months, their insurance could cover your injuries. But if you tripped because you were texting and missed a clear step, it might not qualify as negligence

Myth 5: “If it was just a fall, it can’t be a big injury.”

Slip and falls have a reputation for being “minor accidents.” Many people laugh it off, feel embarrassed, or don’t want to look dramatic: especially online or around friends. But the truth is, falls can cause injuries just as severe as car crashes.

Among older adults, falls are one of the top causes of fatal and life-changing injuries. A broken hip can lead to more serious conditions and even death. Among younger people, they often lead to torn ligaments, concussions, herniated discs, and other conditions that aren’t obvious right away.

The problem is: because the accident seems trivial, people don’t take it seriously. And insurance companies take advantage of that hesitation, using your own delay or downplaying against you.

What feels like “just a fall” can become a long-term medical battle.

Why Misconceptions Matter

Slip and fall claims often hinge on small details: camera footage, maintenance logs, weather conditions, and witness statements. Misunderstanding how liability works can make victims dismiss legitimate claims or, conversely, pursue claims that don’t hold up.

That’s why consulting with a personal injury attorney early on is important. They can help clarify whether negligence occurred, how to document your case, and how Washington’s comparative fault rules might apply to you.

Bottom Line

A slip and fall doesn’t automatically mean you’re to blame, nor does it make a property owner an instant defendant. Liability depends on who acted reasonably and who didn’t.

If you’ve been injured in a fall, whether it happened in a store, at work, or even at a friend’s home, The Advocates can help you understand your rights and guide you through every step of your recovery.